Ted Husted wrote:
>
> On 2/6/2001 at 11:03 PM Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
> >I have no conclusion other than a misc utility project would be a good
> >thing to have, especially if we can get the major players to work out
> >their differences and actually use the thing. I volunteer to help in
> >any way needed.
>
> The only thing I would suggest is that if someone were to propose this
> as a subproject, that it be setup as a serious endeavor, with it's own
> set of active committers, nightly builds, milestones, release plans,
> beta-tests -- the whole nine yards. If Jakarta is going to have a tools
> library, it should be the best tools library money can't buy ;0)
That's exactly what I am trying to say. I know I can't propose.
Not a library, or cache of code. A 'product'. Where there is
dedication to the customers of that product, certainly the internal
Jakarta projects, but also general users who just need a great toolkit.
Call it 'Jakarta Server Platform Tools' or something, and try to draft
as committers interested people from the major internal consumers
(Turbine, Struts, Jetspeed, Velocity) It won't work if it produces Yet
Another Connection Pool to add to the charming array of implementations
offered by Jakarta.
geir
--
Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Velocity : it's not just a good idea. It should be the law.
http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
