Jason van Zyl wrote:
>
> You have totally side stepped the fact that no at xml.apache.org is
> interested in XML-RPC. What exactly is the interest level in
> XML-RPC? I honestly don't know a whole lot about SOAP, but I have
> been using XML-RPC for a long while now and it's simple and works
> great.
Hmmm. I guess it is fair to say that Turbine is not interested in
integrating with Cocoon. If you ignore the recent warm welcome that Berin
has seen, and focus just on the fact that this work has never bubbled to
the top of any existing turbine committers todo list, then I guess it must
be true.
XML-RPC has not bubble to the top of my todo list at the moment. But I
will warmly welcome anybody who wishes to work on it.
> If you are suggesting that the code be immediately be absorbed
> into xml-soap than I definitely don't agree. Is that what you're
> suggesting?
Can you honestly say that you have done your homework?
All I ask is that if/when you do, you approach the problem with an open
mind and a can do attitude, not simply look for reasons why it can't work.
And I will promise to meet you more than half way.
- Sam Ruby
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
