No need.
http://www.metasystema.org/essays/reply-to-useful.mhtml
-warner
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jon Stevens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 1:22 PM
Subject: Re: Reply-to munging
> on 7/10/01 9:36 AM, "Alex Chaffee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Can we turn off the munging of headers that is currently adding Reply-to
on
> > all the jakarta lists?
> >
> > Please read
> > http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
> > before asking why it's a problem.
>
> -1
>
> That document is one persons opinion and shouldn't be taken as everyone's
> opinion. I would *hate* it to always get two copies of everyone's email
> because people are lazy and don't remove the people when they
reply-to-all.
> Yes, I use procmail to filter on messageid, but making everyone do that is
> uncool and it also doesn't work when the messageid from the list is
> modified. Yes, I agree that mail clients should be improved to deal with
> this better, but the fact of the matter is that that isn't going to happen
> anytime soon.
>
> Sigh, one of these days, I need to go write a document that discounts
> everything that person says. Theory is a good thing, but practicality is
> reality.
>
> -jon
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
