I'm not comfortable with carrying this type of editorial matter at the
top of the home page, and would like to move it to the news and status
page.
-Ted.
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: cvs commit: jakarta-site2/xdocs index.xml
Date: 30 Jan 2002 21:53:04 -0000
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: "Jakarta WebSite CVS List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
jon 02/01/30 13:53:04
Modified: docs index.html
xdocs index.xml
Log:
lets have a little fun.
Revision Changes Path
1.52 +32 -0 jakarta-site2/docs/index.html
Index: index.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/cvs/jakarta-site2/docs/index.html,v
retrieving revision 1.51
retrieving revision 1.52
diff -u -r1.51 -r1.52
--- index.html 29 Jan 2002 01:47:06 -0000 1.51
+++ index.html 30 Jan 2002 21:53:03 -0000 1.52
@@ -140,6 +140,38 @@
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="2" width="100%">
<tr><td bgcolor="#525D76">
<font color="#ffffff" face="arial,helvetica,sanserif">
+ <a name="That flaming fireball in the sky..."><strong>That
flaming fireball in the sky...</strong></a>
+ </font>
+ </td></tr>
+ <tr><td>
+ <blockquote>
+ <p>
+In a recent <a
href="http://www.theserverside.com/resources/article.jsp?l=SunInterview";>article</a>,
Karen Tegan, Director of J2EE Compatibility and Platform
+Services for Sun Microsystems, had the following to say:
+</p>
+ <p>
+"The J2EE Compatible brand has achieved significant momentum over the
+past two years, and we want to make sure that any open source efforts
+don't impact the viability of that effort."
+</p>
+ <p>
+In other words, Sun doesn't give a hoot about whether J2EE licensing
+restricts open source J2EE products (in case you missed it, it does).
+Thus, the Apache Software Foundation's involvement in the Java
Community
+Process (JCP) is simply an advertising statement for Sun to claim
that
+they have a 'vision which uses open standards and non-proprietary
+interfaces'. If you would like to express your opinions of Sun's
+licensing terms, feel free to contact <a
href="mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]";>[EMAIL PROTECTED]</a> and let us know what you
+think. Thanks.
+</p>
+ </blockquote>
+ </p>
+ </td></tr>
+ <tr><td><br/></td></tr>
+ </table>
+ <table border="0"
cellspacing="0" cellpadding="2" width="100%">
+ <tr><td bgcolor="#525D76">
+ <font color="#ffffff" face="arial,helvetica,sanserif">
<a name="Welcome"><strong>Welcome</strong></a>
</font>
</td></tr>
1.21 +28 -0 jakarta-site2/xdocs/index.xml
Index: index.xml
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/cvs/jakarta-site2/xdocs/index.xml,v
retrieving revision 1.20
retrieving revision 1.21
diff -u -r1.20 -r1.21
--- index.xml 20 Jan 2002 16:28:07 -0000 1.20
+++ index.xml 30 Jan 2002 21:53:03 -0000 1.21
@@ -9,6 +9,34 @@
<body>
+<section name="That flaming fireball in the sky...">
+<p>
+In a recent <a
+href="http://www.theserverside.com/resources/article.jsp?l=SunInterview";
+>article</a>, Karen Tegan, Director of J2EE Compatibility and
Platform
+Services for Sun Microsystems, had the following to say:
+</p>
+
+<p>
+"The J2EE Compatible brand has achieved significant momentum over the
+past two years, and we want to make sure that any open source efforts
+don't impact the viability of that effort."
+</p>
+
+<p>
+In other words, Sun doesn't give a hoot about whether J2EE licensing
+restricts open source J2EE products (in case you missed it, it does).
+Thus, the Apache Software Foundation's involvement in the Java
Community
+Process (JCP) is simply an advertising statement for Sun to claim
that
+they have a 'vision which uses open standards and non-proprietary
+interfaces'. If you would like to express your opinions of Sun's
+licensing terms, feel free to contact <a
+href="mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]";>[EMAIL PROTECTED]</a> and let us know what
you
+think. Thanks.
+</p>
+
+</section>
+
<section name="Welcome">
<!-- ApacheCon is over.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
