Yu, Yanhui wrote: >Hi, > >I am involved in a pretty large project (we have not really started coding >yet). As far as I can tell, we seem to go with Struts + WSAD + EJBs & Java >+ JSP. Am I right to interpret that you mean the combination of Struts and >EJBs are problem prone? Please help me to clarify on this. Thank you very >much, > >Yanhui > Not at all. Having done this several times, Struts + EJBs are an easy fit, and force some discipline on the developers to separate their actions and business logic.
>-----Original Message----- >From: Vic Cekvenich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 11:42 AM >To: Struts Users Mailing List >Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: EJB = bad = MS.net > > >Home page of Jakarta has this >http://jakarta.apache.org/site/news.html#0130.2 >on this: >http://www.mail-archive.com/general%40jakarta.apache.org/msg03376.html > >I agree. Doing EJBs is bad on many levels and creates more problems. >Avoid EJB if you want to stay in Java. > >Alternative is to just use Struts + TomCat + RowSet (or DAO if you are >doing something simple or small) and done. This is the sweet spot. MVC >is all you need. > >Alternative, do EJBs and your organization WILL switch to MS .NET on the >next project, leave J2EE, and you have to learn VB.net. > >EJBs are for newbies. (If you need middleware (very rare) use SOAP) > >lol, >Vic > > > >-- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > -- dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting http://www.multitask.com.au/developers -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
