At 15:36 29.03.2002 +0000, Danny Angus wrote: > > Now that you can (well, soon) legally implement JSR47's, you > > might was well > > support their interfaces and semantics, and then 'embrace and > > extend'. Just > > do the JSR47 stuff better :) > >Could Log4J now become an RI of JSR47 ? (I'm still not completely clear >about all this..)
No, it cannot. JSR47 is not an some network protocol or an abstract description of an interface, coding rules etc. It is a nuts and bolts implementation. Jason Hunter also mentioned some rule about being part of the JDK 1.4 umbrella JSR which apparently changes things. (Don't ask me why.) -- Ceki My link of the month: http://java.sun.com/aboutJava/standardization/ -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
