Jon Scott Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 23/04/2002 07:35:40 AM:
> on 4/22/02 2:27 PM, "Ellis Teer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I had considered using Torque before I was ready to give Turbine a try. > > Because it's subproject I had the impression that it was dependent on > > Turbine. This delayed me using it by a number of months. It's > > placement as a subproject in my case hurt its adoption. > > > > -Ellis Teer > > www.sitepen.com > > Never assume anything. All you had to do was take the extra effort to ask a > simple question. Don't blame us for your being lazy or confused. <tongue-in-cheek>Lazy, as in too lazy to make Torque a top level project</tongue-in-cheek> > Also, at the top of the Torque page, it says: > > "Torque was developed as part of the Turbine Framework. It is now decoupled > and can be used by itself." Which you'll never know if you don't find it. On a serious note, being a top level project means that more people will find the project. > > -jon -- dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting Work: http://www.multitask.com.au Developers: http://adslgateway.multitask.com.au/developers -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
