on 5/2/02 2:54 AM, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Centaven Reasoning: I don't see how we can easily do this. The approaches
> are wildly different at basic levels, e.g. dvsl vs xsl, entities vs
> external build files for ant, extending GUMPs descriptor vs generating one
> etc. Any 'coming together' is going to be a very difficult decision to get
> past the maven developer community, because they have a tool that works and
> is going in a consistent direction from a design perspective, and that
> coming together will result in much slowing of progress. I don't think,
> IMHO, either tool is mature enough at this point to merge.
I can agree with that. Hell, the dvsl vs. xsl is a showstopper for me.
I can't stand XSL...
> I'm also a little worried about the size/vocality of the centipede
> developer community. Krysalis lists (in the archive) total 53 posts. Maven
> dev (includes cvs) has 780, and the user list 151.
Lol...guess it is really fact now.
------ Forwarded Message
From: "Nicola Ken Barozzi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 1 May 2002 00:10:23 +0200
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: You make the decision (was Re: Quick! convert all yourprojects
to maven!)
Jon said:
> as well as having more developer interest.
That's your opinion.
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
------ End of Forwarded Message
-jon
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
