On Wed, 2002-05-01 at 18:33, Sam Ruby wrote: > James Taylor wrote: > > > > I think that the sanest viewpoint that has been expressed in this thread > > is that both projects are young and need to incubate. Sure, one project > > definition format will be nice to have across apache someday, but were > > still working out the kinks and it's not obvious (well, except to us > > developers =) which is the better way to go. > > If it is obvious, then don't be shy. >
It is obvious. If not for the egos in the way. +1 for centaven +1 for collaboration +1 for nonpartisan sensibility +1 for suiting ALL of POI's needs (served only partly by maven or centipede)....but read my tagline again ;-) > More history. Once upon a time, Gump descriptors were project centric. > Witness: > > >http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs/jakarta-alexandria/proposal/gump/project/Attic/jakarta-turbine-2.xml?rev=1.3&content-type=text/vnd.viewcvs-markup > > Then, Jason decided to normalize them > > >http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs/jakarta-alexandria/proposal/gump/project/Attic/jakarta-turbine-2.xml?rev=1.4&content-type=text/vnd.viewcvs-markup > > Centipede opted to build upon this work. I really would like to converge > the efforts, if even only on the project definition syntax. > > - Sam Ruby > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > -- http://www.superlinksoftware.com http://jakarta.apache.org/poi - port of Excel/Word/OLE 2 Compound Document format to java http://developer.java.sun.com/developer/bugParade/bugs/4487555.html - fix java generics! The avalanche has already started. It is too late for the pebbles to vote. -Ambassador Kosh -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
