James Taylor wrote: > > I think that the sanest viewpoint that has been expressed in this thread > is that both projects are young and need to incubate. Sure, one project > definition format will be nice to have across apache someday, but were > still working out the kinks and it's not obvious (well, except to us > developers =) which is the better way to go.
If it is obvious, then don't be shy. More history. Once upon a time, Gump descriptors were project centric. Witness: http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs/jakarta-alexandria/proposal/gump/project/Attic/jakarta-turbine-2.xml?rev=1.3&content-type=text/vnd.viewcvs-markup Then, Jason decided to normalize them http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs/jakarta-alexandria/proposal/gump/project/Attic/jakarta-turbine-2.xml?rev=1.4&content-type=text/vnd.viewcvs-markup Centipede opted to build upon this work. I really would like to converge the efforts, if even only on the project definition syntax. - Sam Ruby -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
