Michael McCallum wrote: > > Where would be the best place to have a discussion of formalising the project >definition? > (as opposed to the general list?)
If there is interest, I can create a new list. > If there was a common project definition then there would be no hassle > in adopting centipede or maven. And you'd get gump by default. Exactly. We can also define extensibility (through namespaces?) so that projects with needs beyond a core vocabulary can easily be accomodated. - Sam Ruby -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
