Pedantic, I know, but here goes anyway:

Leo wrote:

> Avalon currently uses cocoon (sort of an eat-your-own-dogfood
> case), and
> other developers would like this to stay that way. There is a tool(4)
> that does the same thing as the jakarta project, created by
> people from
> xml.apache. The tool does allow me to plug in this look, and it uses
> cocoon.

> (4) Centipede

  (4) Forrest

Centipede uses Forrest for that, which uses Centipede as its build tool.

So if anyone wants to blame a project for adopting XSLT, it's Forrest
you need to target.

Apart from that, your post deserves my entire blessing (FWIW), and I
urge you to read
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-apache-general&m=102031933515183&w=2
in that respect.

Why am I so obnoxious about all this? My commercial alter-ego (I did
start up a company 6 months ago, hopefully I will now be respected as a
grown-up ;-) wants to provide such an infrastructure to my customers,
since they are going already through the pain of switching from Cobol to
Java/XML and really need a solid project management/documentation/build
environment to do some decent Java coding.

</Steven>


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to