On Tue, 7 May 2002 08:34, Daniel Rall wrote:
> "Geir Magnusson Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I was thinking that a better name might be 'dataaccess' or something to
> > reflect the fact that the scope isn't just about formal db's.
> >
> > Not sure.  We can keep it as 'db' as a working name for now, I suppose.
>
> The only other thing that I could come up with was "persistence"
> (which probably isn't as good as db...not general enough).

I disagree - I think persistence or more likely persist.apache.org is general 
enough. Not sure if it is a snappy enough name though ;)

-- 
Cheers,

Peter Donald


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to