On 5/6/02 6:34 PM, "Daniel Rall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> "Geir Magnusson Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
>> I was thinking that a better name might be 'dataaccess' or something to
>> reflect the fact that the scope isn't just about formal db's.
>> 
>> Not sure.  We can keep it as 'db' as a working name for now, I suppose.
> 
> The only other thing that I could come up with was "persistence"
> (which probably isn't as good as db...not general enough).  I don't
> like "dataaccess" because (other than being ugly) it could be
> construed to preclude data _storage_ (a type of project which
> db.apache.org might eventually host).
> 

Yep on everything but "persistence" :)

-- 
Geir Magnusson Jr.
Research & Development, Adeptra Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+1-203-247-1713



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to