On 5/3/02 6:01 PM, "Thomas Mahler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Welcome, Thomas. > Hi, > > Martin Poeschl wrote: > > <snip> >> there are only 2 apache developers on the ojb developer list (Jason van Zyl >> and me) >> i think it would be good to give the other ojb developers some time to see >> how >> everything works here . >> > > > I agree. We (the OJB developers) will need some time to get used to our > new home. > > OJB has a wide scope (pluggable frontend APIs like JDO and ODMG, JTA and > JCA integration into J2EE app-servers, pluggable backends adaptors for > RDBMS, ODBMS, LDAP, XML, etc.). > You might call it an "object persistence integration platform". > > That's why I believe it is a worthy candidate for db.apache.org. > > I think db.apache.org is a great idea. And we will be happy to be part > of it ! I was going to write to you to discuss the idea, but it's better to discuss here. I am glad to see that you are interested in the idea. Have you read the list messages regarding this? db.apache.org is the working name for a new, db (et al) oriented apache subproject. There are no guarantees that it would be approved by the board. Failure to create such an entity means that OJB would become a jakarta subproject, so there doesn't appear to be a downside for OJB to pursue this if interested. If you haven't read all the posts (and there was good discussion in them), please do. -- Geir Magnusson Jr. Research & Development, Adeptra Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] +1-203-247-1713 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
