So could someone clarify that for me... We're here to promote community
software development....as long as they don't overlap?  sorry I totally
misunderstood the apache way.  (especially with all the overlapping
projects to the contrary)

-Andy

On Sat, 2002-10-19 at 14:29, John McNally wrote:
> On Sat, 2002-10-19 at 06:33, Sam Ruby wrote:
> > John McNally wrote:
> > > -1.  
> > > Jakarta already has two webapp frameworks and I do not see any reason to
> > > add another.  
> > 
> > It is a non-goal of Jakarta to have only one webapp framework, or to 
> > limit itself to two.
> > 
> > - Sam Ruby
> > 
> 
> If a project is proposed that overlaps a (or a few) current project, I
> just think the bar needs to be a bit higher for approval.  If someone
> proposed another java regex package, I think many people would want to
> see distinguishing features and even if a few existed, it should be
> clear that it would be extremely difficult to add the functionality to
> one of the current projects or an attempt has been made to work with one
> of the current projects and the communities are incompatible.
> 
> With database connection pools, I think there were 4 implementations
> floating around the jakarta projects.  When I started to look at
> upgrading turbine's version or dropping it for one with the features I
> was after, I was unable to find a replacement.  This included a survey
> outside jakarta where I investigated PoolMan.  Unfortunately I did not
> look into avalon's pool which may have met my requirements, but
> misconceptions led me to overlook it.  So I set about to create the cp
> that implemented the current api's as specified by jdbc.  I still did
> not want to do this within turbine, so I engaged the connection pool
> project in the commons.  Now it turns out the developer of PoolMan
> wanted to stop development and it was proposed that it be brought to
> apache.  
> 
> I would have said the same thing: jakarta already has a couple database
> connection pools, why do we need this one.  And in addition the ones
> that are here already implement the latest specifications, while this
> proposed one does not.  But PoolMan has name recognition, so it is able
> to overcome my resistance to add YetAnotherDBCP.  And it has a member of
> Apache who is pushing its adoption, which helps to alay my concerns
> about lack of a developer community, though not completely.
> 
> I think one of the goals of jakarta is to create high quality
> implementations of recognized standards and another is to try to create
> standards where they do not formally exist by developing a high quality
> technology that is able to become a defacto standard.
> 
> As much as I hate it, JSP is the recognized standard for webapp
> development.  Jakarta's development of a general purpose java templating
> technology, Velocity, is a valid alternative and is not even in direct
> conflict with JSP.  But it is a simple, powerful alternative to JSP as
> well. Does tapestry give us another alternate template system that is
> only usable within the framework?
> 
> Granted I could try to investigate Tapestry in depth to answer all my
> reservations, but I'm busy and on the surface the project seems to
> overlap several existing projects.  My -1 is not a statement that
> Turbine (or Struts, Velocity, Avalon) should not have any competitors
> within Jakarta.  I would prefer that Tapestry make the case that it
> offers something that these projects do not and I don't think the
> original proposal makes the case forcefully enough.
> 
> john mcnally
>  
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:general-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:general-help@;jakarta.apache.org>
> 
-- 
http://www.superlinksoftware.com - software solutions for business
http://jakarta.apache.org/poi - Excel/Word/OLE 2 Compound Document in
Java                            
http://krysalis.sourceforge.net/centipede - the best build/project
structure
                    a guy/gal could have! - Make Ant simple on complex Projects!
The avalanche has already started. It is too late for the pebbles to
vote.
-Ambassador Kosh


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:general-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:general-help@;jakarta.apache.org>

Reply via email to