So? I think Sam and Ken and the rest are committed to making this relatively painless (sorry for the cross post, I don't like talking about people behind their back...I prefer a more personal approach to insults...hehe ;-) ). I'm committed to avoiding the Apache "the land of Catch-22s" Syndrome.. We'll get there.
Now, this looks like a little bit contradictory to me, you say "let's vote"
(and I assume that the Jakarta community needs to vote), the Jakarta
president says "let's make Incubator vote, and Tapestry be our guinea pig".
As I said, I'm not a part of this community (not a committer, not a PMClittle details... We'll work them out. Lets be positive :-)
member), neither a member of the Incubator community, but seeing it things
from a little bit of distance, WHO needs to vote? Jakarta or Incubator?
I still keep my reasonable doubt that _right_now_ timing is not right, andNo the timing is perfect. The timing to work with them to bring them into the fold. The completion of this task requires hard work dedication and committment. The great news is these are parallel tasks. Tapestry can adopt apache voting rules while we mold the pottery with our flames (j/k) over here! Isn't this good stuff? I think so. (but then again I'm very strange)
that certain issues about who and where need to be solved before Tapestry,
or any other project FWIW, can land in the Apache sphere...
Lets not inundate them with details, lets just be helpful. Who's with us?
-Andy
Pier
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:general-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:general-help@;jakarta.apache.org>
-- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:general-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:general-help@;jakarta.apache.org>
