> -----Original Message----- > From: Andrew C. Oliver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 26. mars 2003 20:10 > To: Jakarta General List > Subject: Re: XDoclet, XJavaDoc, Apache and Licensing > > > > > > No, not implementing any JavaDoc API at all. I think the main issue > > is that the API "mirrors" the com.sun.* API in terms of the source > > code model that it builds. > > *http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.1/j2sdk-1_4_1_02-license.html > " > 4. Java Technology Restrictions.* You may not modify the Java Platform > Interface ("JPI", identified as classes contained within the "java" > package or any subpackages of the "java" package), by creating > additional classes within the JPI or otherwise causing the addition to > or modification of the classes in the JPI. In the event that you create > an additional class and associated API(s) which (i) extends the > functionality of the Java platform, and (ii) is exposed to third party > software developers for the purpose of developing additional software > which invokes such additional API, you must promptly publish broadly an > accurate specification for such API for free use by all developers. You > may not create, or authorize your licensees to create, additional > classes, interfaces, or subpackages that are in any way identified as > "java", "javax", "sun" or similar convention as specified by Sun in any > naming convention designation. > " > > -Andy >
Ok, that's a bunch of stuff we're not allowed to do (regarding package names), and AFAICT we (XJavaDoc) are not doing any of that. What's your point Andy? Aslak > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
