On Nov 10, 2003, at 5:00 PM, Vic Cekvenich wrote:

Geir, are you supporting his actions, the ethics in here, denying what that developer is saying, ie: that is not his code? I know my code when I see it. What part are you supporting, all of it?

-Stein is the one that railroaded this project on the lists, a chairman. It is easy to trace messages that lead us to this.

Sorry, this is not the case. I know. I was there.


-Durign his "rule", ASF brand was embarased. What does it mean, ASF developer now?

I disagree about the ASF brand being embarrassed. I also think that being an ASF developer now means just the same as it always has.

-Using ASF funds for this is a shame and a waste.

Why? Because you say so?


You seem to think that somehow the ASF decided (or was brainwashed by
Greg) to *steal* JBoss code. That is not the case, and it
has been mentioned so many times that repeating it again is
enough to make me sick. You also seem to think that the idea
is that "So what if GPL/JBoss code is in there? We'll
just take it." Again, this is so far from the truth that
again I wonder just how you are getting your information...
possibly a dyslexic carrier pigeon.

But once again: if Geronimo has any GPL code in it, whether from
JBoss or not, then it will be expunged. We've always said that.
What we are doing now is looking at "cases" where such claims
are being made and whether or not they have any merit, while
at the same time reviewing what's in CVS.

Got it?


--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to