robert burrell donkin wrote: > On 4 Dec 2003, at 22:35, Andrew C. Oliver wrote: > > <snip> > >> From a Jakarta PMC perspective, I think that we should cease to support >> Sub-sub-projects with the exception of commons.* > > i think that it depends on what's meant by sub-sub-projects :) > > i'm happy for a single sub-project to create many different products > (by this i mean stuff it releases). so, component repositories like > jakarta-commons are fine by me. (some people describe these products as > sub-sub-projects.) > > but i think that each sub-project should only have one list of > committers (though for reasons of security, if a sub-project has more > than one repository, karma for a repository may be given out only on > request) and one development mailing list. so i'd like to prohibit any > sub-sub-projects like jakarta-turbine-JCS.
Or even better - since jakarta has a single PMC, it could also have a single list of committers ( most of them in the single PMC ). Each PMC member can vote about any jakarta issue - including releases of each sub-project, etc. If the distinction between pmc and committer is fading, then I don't see why do we have to worry about separate karma. A start could be to have every PMC member have karma in every subproject. Costin --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
