> I don't understand why anything but the actual vote needs to be in
private.
> There should probably be a public nomination list with reasons for hand
> picking (if hand picked) and a public results list
If you are nominated and not elected people would know. Otherwise, there is
privacy. I do agree that when the results are known they could and should
be published.
> Also this process of electing members in batches of 20 or so is time
consuming
The problem is that there are 100s of Commiters, and only a relative handful
of PMC members. So the PMC members nominated as many people as they knew
from working with. There are a lot on that list. Once they are on, I hope
that they will be able to nominate the bulk of the remaining active members.
Time consuming, yes. Something of an artifact from things getting as out of
hand as they did, so hopefully not something that will need to be repeated.
--- Noel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
