Re: Extending the PMC ( was: Re: [PROPOSAL] Proactively encourage TLP status)

[Geir Magnusson Jr.]

On Jan 14, 2004, at 3:30 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:



On Wed, 14 Jan 2004, Noel J. Bergman wrote:

I don't understand why anything but the actual vote needs to be in
private.
There should probably be a public nomination list with reasons for 
hand
picking (if hand picked) and a public results list
If you are nominated and not elected people would know.  Otherwise, 
there is
privacy.  I do agree that when the results are known they could and 
should
be published.
Is there any reason for privacy if you are nominated, elected, but 
choose
not to accept?
I don't think so.  We want *everyone* to accept.

Or should I go ahead and publish the list of people who are being
recommended to the board as PMC members [probably a day or so after a
[RESULT] on the pmc list just in case there are arguments over the
results].
Yes - once we get the list complete (based on acceptance)...



Hen

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
Geir Magnusson Jr                                   203-247-1713(m)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]