I'm not sure I understand #12... is it talking about providing a JAR of
a release for archival purposes?
I would like to see this project adopt the packaging scheme my own Java
Web Parts project has in that each actual Java package is JAR'd
separately. That way a developer can easily pick and choose which parts
they want to use.
I mention that because depending on what #12 really is talking about,
that could conflict with that idea. I'm not sure.
Frank
robert burrell donkin wrote:
On Wed, 2005-06-22 at 14:40 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
<snip>
Don't know what kind of goo 12 would result in or who would use such a
thing ;-)
this has proved impractical in the jakarta commons. i propose we drop
point 12.
- robert
--8<-----------------------------------------------------------
[ ] +1 Get rid!
[ ] -1 Keep it (please give a reason...)
--------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Frank W. Zammetti
Founder and Chief Software Architect
Omnytex Technologies
http://www.omnytex.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
