On 12/14/05, Daniel F. Savarese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Someone submitted a Bugzilla request for an Implementation-Vendor-Id > value to be added to the oro jars (without explaining why they needed > it given that Implementation-Vendor is defined). I don't think we've > ever specified a standard Implementation-Vendor-Id for Jakarta jar files. > Will the following do: > Implementation-Vendor-Id: org.apache > > Should I add that to: > http://jakarta.apache.org/site/packageversioning-manifest.template > > Or do we just not care about Implementation-Vendor-Id, in which case > I'll close the issue report as WONTFIX?
Not sure about Implementation-Vendor-Id, but Commons components include something like the following: Implementation-Title: org.apache.commons.fileupload Implementation-Vendor: The Apache Software Foundation Implementation-Version: 1.1-RC1 -- Martin Cooper daniel > > > -#-#-#-#-#-#-#-#-#-#-#-#-#-#-#-#-#-#-#-#-#-#-#-#-#-#-#-#-#-#-#-#-#-#-#-#-#-#- > s a v a r e s e # In distant lands, I hear the call of my home. > software research # Yet my work is not done. My journey's just > begun. > http://www.savarese.com/ # -- http://www.sleepandthetraveller.com/ > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
