In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, robert burrell donkin write s: >i've done some hunting round and it appears that now this really should >be set: implementation-vendor-id is used by later versions of the >extension mechanism and it no longer works unless it is set. see >http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/guide/extensions/versioning.html.
Yep, it looks like that's why they needed it. This is the additonal explanation I got today via bugzilla: "... actually, we need this (in my company) to specify dependencies in to oro in our apps with the Extension-List mechanism. For instance Tomcat does not consider that a dependency is resolved if the "extension" we depend on does not specify this entry." After looking at the previous JDK docs, it appears this requirement was introduced in J2SE 1.3. >the org.apache looks about right and it'd be great if you could update >the documentation :) Okay, I took care of it. Thanks for the guidance. daniel --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
