On Wed, 2005-12-14 at 13:14 -0500, Daniel F. Savarese wrote: > Someone submitted a Bugzilla request for an Implementation-Vendor-Id > value to be added to the oro jars (without explaining why they needed > it given that Implementation-Vendor is defined). I don't think we've > ever specified a standard Implementation-Vendor-Id for Jakarta jar files. > Will the following do: > Implementation-Vendor-Id: org.apache > > Should I add that to: > http://jakarta.apache.org/site/packageversioning-manifest.template > > Or do we just not care about Implementation-Vendor-Id, in which case > I'll close the issue report as WONTFIX?
i've done some hunting round and it appears that now this really should be set: implementation-vendor-id is used by later versions of the extension mechanism and it no longer works unless it is set. see http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/guide/extensions/versioning.html. the org.apache looks about right and it'd be great if you could update the documentation :) anyone else who knows more want to jump in? - robert --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
