I like #1 (removing svn restrictions).  We occasionally identify bugs in the
commons libraries used in Velocity - it'd be nice to be able to just go in
and fix them.

I'm mildly positive on "all votes on general".  A corollary of this would be
to encourage everyone to sign up for general. Maybe put this in big letters
on the Jakarta home page.  It seems a good way to try out the "one
community" idea, see if it fits.

WILL


On 3/5/06, Nathan Bubna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 3/5/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I started to write a long email on the problems in Jakarta, on
> umbrellas,
> > on the lack of a Jakarta community and existence only of subcommunities
> > and on how it should be "there is no Jakarta Xxxx, you are members of
> > Jakarta - not a subproject"; but you've heard it all before.
> >
> > So, proposal:
> >
> > -----------------------------------------------------------------
> > Given that we are one project and that we should be acting as one
> > community - I propose that we:
> >
> > 1) Remove SVN restrictions, all Jakarta committers can commit anywhere
> in
> > Jakarta, with the exception of the Commons-Sandbox as it allows Apache
> > committers in general to commit.
>
> i think this is fine.  it brings our practice more in line with the
> legal realities of the organization.  it adds potential for greater
> cross-pollination and lower barriers to resuscitating dormant
> projects.  it's true that most of us committers are myopic and do
> nothing with the greater freedom, but the potential is there for some
> to more easily serve the community and their own needs through this.
>
> > 2) All vote threads to occur on the general@ mailing list; or the pmc@
> > mailing list if deemed private.
>
> if you want all non-private vote threads to be CC'ed to general@,
> that's fine, but they must happen on the dev lists as well.  i believe
> there are many narrow, non-committer participants who give good
> feedback and non-binding support who do not subscribe to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  i
> am extremely reluctant to give that up.
>
> > -----------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Comments?
> >
> > The only negative I have for 1) is that I like to use the commit lists
> to
> > see who is on which subproject (for 3 PMC member oversight checking),
> but
> > that is a flawed idea anyway. The real way is to see who is voting on
> > issues (especially releases) for that project. If it's an inactive
> > project, the real way is to ask the -dev mailing list for 3 PMC replies
> > else the subproject gets mothballed.
> >
> > Hen
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>


--
_______________________________________
Forio Business Simulations

Will Glass-Husain
phone (415) 440-7500 x89
mobile (415) 235-4293
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.forio.com

Reply via email to