On 08/03/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > "Jakarta Rocks Betwixt" (ignoring that the ones for JLC have boring names) > > Do we really need 3 catchy terms? > > From my point of view, the part that fancy names misses is that these are > not subprojects, they are just component groupings to make email and the > website easier to grasp.
+1 > This does put an onus on the website to make it easy to find the component > you used to know was in Commons, ie) a simple component index etc. +1 I'd much prefer something like Jakarta Lang[uage] Components Jakarta Web Components etc I then have some idea what each contains, with having to remember that Bogart means Language, and Bacall means Web etc. Otherwise, we might as well call them Jakarta Group A Jakarta Group B Jakarta Group C S. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
