On Wed, 2006-03-08 at 16:54 +0000, sebb wrote: > I'd much prefer something like > > Jakarta Lang[uage] Components > Jakarta Web Components > etc > > I then have some idea what each contains, with having to remember that > Bogart means Language, and Bacall means Web etc. > > Otherwise, we might as well call them > > Jakarta Group A > Jakarta Group B > Jakarta Group C
+1 Simple project or group names seem best to me. For us developers who are working with jakarta stuff daily clever names are not a nuisance because we soon memorise what they are associated with. However I think they just make it harder for others to find projects they are interested in. These clever names can also be hard on non-native english speakers. For them, the name can be a completely meaningless phrase. Silk? Syllable? And of course there's the earlier point that what's currently under discussion is *not* a project or a TLP; it's just a grouping of jakarta stuff to reduce mail-list and website overload. Cheers, Simon --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
