Good points... I guess we can wait with the fancy names until these
Jakarta X Component groupings become their own TLPs... Remember the
Rocks ;)

Y

On 3/8/06, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 08/03/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > "Jakarta Rocks Betwixt" (ignoring that the ones for JLC have boring names)
> >
> > Do we really need 3 catchy terms?
> >
> > From my point of view, the part that fancy names misses is that these are
> > not subprojects, they are just component groupings to make email and the
> > website easier to grasp.
>
> +1
>
> > This does put an onus on the website to make it easy to find the component
> > you used to know was in Commons, ie) a simple component index etc.
>
> +1
>
> I'd much prefer something like
>
> Jakarta Lang[uage] Components
> Jakarta Web Components
> etc
>
> I then have some idea what each contains, with having to remember that
> Bogart means Language, and Bacall means Web etc.
>
> Otherwise, we might as well call them
>
> Jakarta Group A
> Jakarta Group B
> Jakarta Group C
>
> S.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>


--
Yoav Shapira
Senior Architect
Nimalex LLC
1 Mifflin Place, Suite 310
Cambridge, MA, USA
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.yoavshapira.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to