Hi Julius,

> Regarding the BouncyCastle code, I sent an email to the BouncyCastle
> mailing list.  Here's the reply I got:
> [...]
>> If attribution is included we have no issue with the section of code
>> being included in a product distributed under Apache 2.0.
> [...]
> I hope that's sufficient to address the licensing concern.

The "attribution" part probably means that the code must still carry
the BouncyCastle license rather than the Apache license. I guess a
lawyer will have to look into this, unless the BouncyCastle license
has been discussed before.


To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to