Hi Julius, > Regarding the BouncyCastle code, I sent an email to the BouncyCastle > mailing list. Here's the reply I got: > > [...] >> If attribution is included we have no issue with the section of code >> being included in a product distributed under Apache 2.0. > [...] > > I hope that's sufficient to address the licensing concern.
The "attribution" part probably means that the code must still carry the BouncyCastle license rather than the Apache license. I guess a lawyer will have to look into this, unless the BouncyCastle license has been discussed before. cheers, Roland --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
