Martin Cooper wrote: > On 2/23/07, Martin van den Bemt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> I prefer this vote to see where it should end up in Jakarta and based on >> that result the path full >> incubation / legal incubation is decided. >> >> So in my view the vote should be : >> >> [ ] Jakarta should sponsor (which effectively states we like to see the >> code end up here) > > > +1 > > [ ] Jakarta shouldn't sponsor (which effectively means it will end up TLP) > > > No, it means that it still needs to find a Sponsor before it can be > accepted > into incubation. It says nothing about where it will end up after > incubation > or even if it will start incubation. > > if accepted in Jakarta, it should end up in : > > > This is not relevant. The final location of a project is not decided until > it is ready to _exit_ incubation, so it's more than a little premature > to be discussing this here.
Let's keep this statement your personal opinion on the fact that it is not relevant. I still like to know the opinion of others. Main reason : it is very interesting to see to figure out what the exit criteria should be for a small component like ssl (besides the IP stuff). Would be nice to get Robert's view on this (I will start a discussion after the vote, so the vote doesn't get too polluted). Could be that I am the only one seeing the difference during incubation depending on the target within Jakarta, so if that's the case it's probably best for SSL that other people step up as mentors and champions. Mvgr, Martin --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
