[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi, > > The thread "[Proposal] James News List & Feed" has come to a consensus > amongst robert Stefano and I, therefore would you please vote on the > following item: > > James news is awkward to update, because it requires two xml files to > be edited, and the site to be generated and checked back in, then the > web server to be updated. Using an external blogging service will > considerably reduce that bar and possibly result in us publishing news > more often. So > > [ ] +1 I a agree > [X] 0 I don't care > [ ] -1 I disagree
Would have been +1, but I don't much like the opportunity for comments on the site. Who is going to monitor and respond to these? If we are going to allow comments, I'm also not too fond of introducing a dependency on a commercial third party; the need for a gmail account. Go ahead and call me picky. Cheers -- Steve
