On 8/16/07, Danny Angus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 8/16/07, Steve Brewin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Would have been +1, but I don't much like the opportunity for comments on > > the site. Who is going to monitor and respond to these? If we are going to > > allow comments, > > Ok we can disable comments, makes sense to me. ... Done. > > > > I'm also not too fond of introducing a dependency on a > > commercial third party; the need for a gmail account. Go ahead and call me > > picky. > > That bothers me to, but unless we get someone who is prepared to host > it for us, and I don't think infra@ are going to, we're left with the > status quo or the mail-archive feed idea we already rejected because > it doesn't allow us to re-edit. > > If you're not +1 what are you? 0 or -1
i like the idea but am uncomfortable with an official resource being hosted off shore i'm much more comfortable with the blog being an unofficial resource linked from the site - robert
