Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: > On 8/16/07, Danny Angus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On 8/16/07, Steve Brewin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> Would have been +1, but I don't much like the opportunity for comments on >>> the site. Who is going to monitor and respond to these? If we are going to >>> allow comments, >> Ok we can disable comments, makes sense to me. ... Done. >> >> >>> I'm also not too fond of introducing a dependency on a >>> commercial third party; the need for a gmail account. Go ahead and call me >>> picky. >> That bothers me to, but unless we get someone who is prepared to host >> it for us, and I don't think infra@ are going to, we're left with the >> status quo or the mail-archive feed idea we already rejected because >> it doesn't allow us to re-edit. >> >> If you're not +1 what are you? 0 or -1 > > i like the idea but am uncomfortable with an official resource being > hosted off shore > > i'm much more comfortable with the blog being an unofficial resource > linked from the site > > - robert
I see this issue shared by many. Why don't we file an INFRA/JIRA request for a Confluence space named "JAMES"? If I understand it the only problem is that very few volunteer are enabled to do that but I saw that today 2 spaces have been created after a month of "stall". Maybe the volunteer with the right karma is right there right now ;-) Maybe creating a new space is not a big issue for them and once we have the space we can decide whether to start using it as a news/blogging tool and then maybe in future we'll move there some of our moin-moin wiki or some of our website (with auto-export enabled like other projects did). If I understand it, using an Apache hosted confluence space (on cwiki.apache.org) and placing there the news feed would resolve the reservations shown here. Should I start a vote for this? WDYT? Back on topic, here is my vote for the current thread: [X] +0 I don't care, or better, it's up to you (you, willing to use the blog) I don't think the blog will simplify *my* workflow as most time I added a news I also had to publish something else in the website and the website workflow is really "poor" now, but I can't avoid it at all even if we introduce the blog. BUT if Danny and/or anyone else is willing to use the Blog then it is really a welcome improvement. Stefano
