Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
On Feb 5, 2008 7:32 PM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
2) Will the mailet util library be an "util" product similar to api, std
and crypto?
not sure we need a util library ATM. if possible, i'd prefer to
include the utils in std for now.
The only issue is that some "library" module in james-server will have
to depend on std-mailets because of these utilities (unless we duplicate
the utility code).
But we can split them later, if needed.
I'm not sure that maven will be happy with a similar structure, but if
we can get maven to work (build the website) and the answers to the 2
questions above are "yes" then you convinced me and I'm fine with this
solution :-)
it works over in the commons
Cool!
Stefano