On Feb 6, 2008 8:40 AM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: > > On Feb 5, 2008 7:32 PM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> 2) Will the mailet util library be an "util" product similar to api, std > >> and crypto? > > > > not sure we need a util library ATM. if possible, i'd prefer to > > include the utils in std for now. > > The only issue is that some "library" module in james-server will have > to depend on std-mailets because of these utilities (unless we duplicate > the utility code). > But we can split them later, if needed.
providing that it's the coupled classes are mailets that haven't been moved from JAMES then i'm happy for a temporary dependency - robert
