I do agree on the bit addressing the fact that CS teaching standards are not what they used to be.. sad but true. However, i think the writer is overdoing it.. its plain to see that he's an idealist.. if not from context, his choice of words bluntly shows it.. Not all CS students are supposed to be rocket scientests.. and after all.. its not like the market demands them to be anyway.. Commercial software will be written by comemrcial CS professionals.. cheap software will be written by cheap professionals.. and good software too will be written by good professionals.. theres an audience and a demand for each of these categories.. and to me (at least), that more than justifies their existence.
/me out >X-Source-Dir: Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >X-OriginalArrivalTime: 19 Jan 2006 00:56:48.0395 (UTC) >FILETIME=[39E88DB0:01C61C93] > >Just for fun: >http://www.ibiblio.org/Dave/Dr-Fun/df9407/df940727.jpg > >:-) >Basem > >_______________________________________________ >General mailing list >[email protected] >http://mail.jolug.org/mailman/listinfo/general_jolug.org _______________________________________________ General mailing list [email protected] http://mail.jolug.org/mailman/listinfo/general_jolug.org
