-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 "Mark D. Niemiec" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> My intent was not to suggest that J needs more primitives. > Rather, I was trying to say that the argument that > "having special primitives for specific instances of more general > mechanisms" > is bad because it obscures those general mechanims > is a weak one, because J already has dozens of examples in which it already > does exactly that. Mark, Thanks. I understand your point better now. Bill - -- Bill Harris http://facilitatedsystems.com/weblog/ Facilitated Systems Everett, WA 98208 USA http://facilitatedsystems.com/ phone: +1 425 337-5541 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (MingW32) Comment: For more information, see http://www.gnupg.org iD4DBQFFzDvx3J3HaQTDvd8RAnO+AJwPoQL6rAIkMMStWwgaQ6rBhtmfKACYzL/w +SjJukyiW5ISTUvbGES1gA== =z3CB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
