Henry,

It's just another layer, but would the atom, list, table hierarchy work? A two dimensional non atomic array could be called a table. Is this useful or have I missed the point?

Cheers, bob

On 4-Apr-07, at 4:01 PM, Henry Rich wrote:

Like Oleg, I had thought that an 'array' had to have
rank > 0.  It doesn't, which is a pity IMO.

I would love to have a word for a non-atomic array,
but I can't think of one.  Can anyone?

Henry Rich

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to