> To my knowledge, tolerant i.~ uses "intolerant grade up". In J, grade of any kind is currently not used in the dyad i. of any kind.
----- Original Message ----- From: Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wednesday, June 6, 2007 11:33 am Subject: Re: [Jgeneral] Re: Challenge to expert J'ers > On 6/6/07, Morten Kromberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I may be missing something, but I think this depends on which of > X1, X2 and > > X3 are "the correct value". If X2 is the quote correct unquote > answer and X1 > > and X3 are the result of using slightly different computations > to arrive at > > it, then the application is going to want to see X1, X2 and X3 > all end up in > > the same bucket when the transactions are sorted. If X1 is > correct then > > maybe X3 should be left out if it is not tolerantly equal. > > I do not understand what you are getting at, here. > > > I think this means that arriving at the "desired" result requires > > information which a general "tolerant grade up" cannot have > (which of X1, X2 > > and X3 are "closest to the right result"). > > To my knowledge, tolerant i.~ uses "intolerant grade up". > Tolerant grade up is a completely different issue, as far as > I can tell. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
