I'm using a 2 Intel Xeon CPU HP Proliant server with 4GB ram running
Windows 2000 Advance Server as an application server for J. :)

To FULLY use the capability of the server, I create a C++ windows
service with creates an instance of J for each client request.

I normally have 4 concurrent users but during the middle and the end of
the month ... my concurrent users would peak at around 24 J instances.
The instance would allocate normally allocate around 100MB of memory.
Fortunately, each J instance would normally finish its job in less than
1 minute and release its resources. Of course, there are borderline
cases where J allocated more than 500mb of memory and sometimes would
linger around until it's done but I've never seen the machine brought
down to its knees. The machine is pretty expensive but it's our
production server so I was able to justify the cost and the machine is
going 4 years old this year and we've yet to crash it. 

I am actually thinking of requesting a 64bit machine this coming capital
expenditure (CAPEX) meeting so I will be able to allocate more than 1GB
memory. :)

So my suggestion? Get a 64bit Mac Pro. It's my dream desktop machine. 

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roelof K Brouwer
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2008 12:21 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Jgeneral] dell precision t7400

I am looking at purchasing a dell precision t7400 with vista 64
operating
system and quad core probably with the main purpose of developing and
running J coded  algorithms.

I have some decisions to make

Such as how much ram

Quad core or dual quad core

Linux, Windows XP or vista 64

I am favouring vista 64 at this time

Does anyone have any ideas

 

cheers

 

Roelof  

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to