> ---Markus Schmidt-Gröttrup wrote:
> > I'd like to emphasize Rauls hints to make use of the
> > different displays.
> > If you show:
> >
> > 9!:3 (4)
> >
> > [ {~ [: ? ] $ [: # [
> > +- [
> > +- ~ --- {
> > |
> > --+ +- [:
> > | +- ?
> > +-----+ +- ]
> > | +- $
> > +----+ +- [:
> > +---+- #
> > +- [
> >
> > or the boxed display, the forks are seen, even before you
> > what elements
> > are adverbs or conjunctions.
>
> From: "Sherlock, Ric" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Wow! Funnily enough I don't think I've ever tried the tree display option.
> I usually use a combination of linear and box, but as you say, tree does a
> better job of distinguishing the forks from the `verb adverb` and `verb conj
> verb` combinations. I'm inclined to go with the idea I mentioned in my reply
> to
> Raul, - link to a new page that describes the different displays (including
> the
> one that was recently developed on the forum).
>
> > In defining verbs an important aspect is to determine the
> > rank. Perhaps your next contribution?
>
> Or yours? ;-) If you start it off I'm sure others will help!
Here's how map display would've looked
maprep <'v1'
[ {~ [: ? ] $ [: # [
└────┘
└────────┘
└┘ └─────────────┘
We have so far,
map 5!:6 <'v1'
[ ({~) ([: ? (] $ ([: # [)))
└──────┘
└────────────┘
└──┘ └───────────────────┘
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
