Thank you Brian,
What you say is most helpful. I just have to go away and digest it. I
realize that what I was trying to express won't work in J. I was hoping I
could get J modified to accept something new.
I also had some useful material from Bjorn. Thank you. I have to digest
that as well. Maybe I'll be quiet for a while I learn more about J and
take my vacation in the sun.
I also changed my table for translating u. or u: primitives into a
single meaningful primitive. Last time I was assuming that the monadic form
and the dyadic form had to have the same symbol. That led to a real mess for
a couple of primitives trying to look like both. However, the system knows
from the context whether the primitive is monadic or dyadic. Where
necessary, it can have a different symbol for each. A new table is at:
http://www.bcompanion.com/EquivalentSymbols
Comments would be helpful on these symbols. I am trying to improve in
response to your comments.
Thanks,
Don
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
