--- Matthew Carpenter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Not necessarily, just that some groups are a lot more worthy of > concern > than others. Hypothetically, lets consider the direct end of that > route: > US is the only one allowed to have Nuclear weapons. Wrong. Or I > suppose > you think we ought not to either. Ok, I won't even argue that one.
Please dont' put words into my mouth. I've got nothing against nuclear weapons, although their only use can be as a deterrant, since as soon as one party uses theirs, it will be the end of the world, literally. > The > immediate truth is that we can't get rid of ours... yet. I dont' see how we can get rid of ours at any time in my lifetime. > Do you worry about a sniper shooting you when you leave your house? > No? > Not yet? Why? Because there isn't reason for that concern yet. The > situation which surrounds you is slightly different than the situation > in > DC (at least for the moment and hopefully long-term). So? I dont' see your point. ===== ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Lonni J. Friedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Linux Step-by-step help: http://netllama.ipfox.com . __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Y! Web Hosting - Let the expert host your web site http://webhosting.yahoo.com/ _______________________________________________ General mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/general
