Lonni J Friedman wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005, Michael Hipp wrote:
You won't see much of this in the legacy media but it makes a very
interesting read.
By legacy media, i can only assume you mean non-ultra-conservative media.
No, I mean the previously monopolistic, dominant and thankfully dying
severe left media.
If you're in a hurry skip toward the bottom to the sections entitled
'Responsibilities Unfulfilled' and 'Failed Execution of the Plan'.
Michael
------------------------------------------
Why New Orleans Flooded
Phil Brennan, NewsMax.com
Tuesday, Sept. 13, 2005
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2005/9/12/210912.shtml
errr, wow they suck. two pop-ups just going to the front page (one of
them a huge ad titled "the hidden truth about Hillary" (Clinton). If
there was any doubt about their bias, it was quickly eliminated. Then on
the actual page there are a slew of ads for guns, miracle cures, gold
coins with Jesus on them, and 'bet on Iraq'.
At least The New Republic has some class and attempts to be journalistic
in their presentation.
Fallacious arguments:
Poisoning the Well
http://www.nizkor.org/features/fallacies/poisoning-the-well.html
Circumstantial Ad Hominem
http://www.nizkor.org/features/fallacies/circumstantial-ad-hominem.html
Guilt By Association
http://www.nizkor.org/features/fallacies/guilt-by-association.html
Did you actually read the article or just make a quick search for some
fallacious arguments to attempt to discredit the source?
_______________________________________________
[email protected]
Unsub/Pause/Etc : http://mail.linux-sxs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general
