On Tue, 13 Sep 2005, Alma J Wetzker wrote: > > Try reading the article in the Wall Street Journal. You get rid of the > overt bias and advertising of the web site, and you get to see the facts > as presented, not someone else's interpretation of what they think is > important. > > Or is the WSJ off limits because people like Dennis Kozlowski, Bernard > Ebbers and Kenneth Lay read it? Yes it tends to be more conservative. > Yes it tends to support people who want to make money. That still has > little to do with fact reporting, where they do a pretty good job.
I've got nothing against the WSJ. They have journalistic integrity. > > Or is the real problem that it no longer looks like Bush can be blamed > if you are aware of these facts? I've yet to see any evidence to support that. -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Lonni J Friedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] LlamaLand http://netllama.linux-sxs.org _______________________________________________ [email protected] Unsub/Pause/Etc : http://mail.linux-sxs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general
