mutilated misquotes from Net Llama!'s 8 Jan 2006 classic prose may follow:
" On 01/08/2006 07:24 AM, Ken Moffat wrote: [8><....] " > me "Those guys, O'Reilly and Hannity really tell it like it is!" They " " Which is really their way of saying, "they're telling me what I want to " hear". There is enough truth in Llama's point that the honest people among us really ought to feel more than just a bit uncomfortable. It seems to be a natural tendency, and one that makes getting to the completely accurate truth more difficult than it ought to be, that each of us tends to seek out commentary that we agree with. But if there were to be an implication that a person's opinion is incorrect or ought to be dismissed because someone else, no matter who, agrees with it - that implication would have no merit. 'Wrong is wrong even if everyone does it; right is right even if no one does it.' R -- http://www.quen.net "Gold needs no endorsement, it can be tested with scales and acids. The recipient of gold does not have to trust the government stamp upon it, if he does not trust the government that stamped it. No act of faith is called for when gold is used in payments, and no compulsion is required." -Benjamin M. Anderson _______________________________________________ [email protected] Unsub/Pause/Etc : http://mail.linux-sxs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general
