On Tue, 10 Oct 2006, Bruce Marshall wrote:
> On Tuesday 10 October 2006 10:59, Net Llama! wrote:
>> Crushing constitutional & civil rights is far worse than the evils
>> committed by prior administrations.
>
> And if the Dems come into power....  what will they do to the 2nd 
> amendment?
>
> There are evils on both sides of the aisle.

Its funny how the only ammendment that the Republicans care about is their 
right to arm themselves.  Who cares if you can be imprisoned forever 
without a trial, as long as you can carry a gun around before they lock 
you up & throw away the key.

What I've never understood (and would genuinely like to understand) is 
how the right to bear arms benefits anyone?  Sure, you can hunt animals in 
the woods, but I've never heard anyone getting fired up over the potential 
loss of that right.  Most folks get very ticked off that they lose their 
right to defend themselves.  What exactly are you defending yourself from? 
Unless I'm missing something (and perhaps I am), the only time a gun 
benefits you is when the person attacking you has a smaller/weaker gun, or 
no gun at all.  And as we all know, in an arms race, there are no winners, 
only losers.  When it comes down to it, unless you distrust the govt, such 
that you feel that you're going to need to defend yourself from their 
attack, what good is a gun going to do you?  And if the govt is coming 
after you, the odds of you having sufficient & large enough weapons & ammo 
are just about nil.

So, can someone actually help me to understand all of this?  I honestly 
would like to understand it better.

-- 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Lonni J Friedman                        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
LlamaLand                               http://netllama.linux-sxs.org
_______________________________________________
[email protected]
Unsub/Pause/Etc : http://mail.linux-sxs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general

Reply via email to