Awesome!

About my proposal, i succeeded contacting my coleagues but the dissolution
of the team is irreversible and i could not find anyone else within the BR
group (the origin of the people involved is not a matter whatsoever).

On the other hand, Shadowbranch is back and his work is far more complete of
anything that i could provide, i believe AS could stick with what he'll
provide.

In the mean time,  i will work out on something that i could also use for my
needs.

Sorry for the long delay on the answer, i was trying to reason with them

Cheers,
--
Eduardo Martins Lopes
Laboratory of Theoretical Chemistry
Universidade Federal de São Carlos,  SP - Brazil


2011/3/16 Daniel Moree <[email protected]>

> The new version is not modular. The new cms is more a basic framework. The
> app will be the primary focus of the release and will be fully imported into
> the app git repo at the AS website.
>
> Eduardo Martins Lopes <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >Hello all,
> >
> >Phillip: What would you require from us? What would the server deps be
> like?
> >You're planning to use PostgreSQL (or even better, be database-agnostic)?
> >@Phillip: it's DB Agnostic as stated by Faelar, but the hosting service
> >would need to have python available, ssh access and fascgi (it's possible
> to
> >use other cgi-like stuff).
> >
> >The big thing is, in my humble opinion, both solutions are tied to a
> one-man
> >show in some sort. Up to now, only one from my team has answered already,
> so
> >not a big group yet. Shadowbranch's solution will become available a bit
> >faster than mine, though i would like to know more about this new release
> >would require the cms frame.
> >
> >@Shadowbranch: does your new version depend on your cms? or it would be
> able
> >to run on it's own?
> >
> >
> >Cheers
> >--
> >Eduardo Martins Lopes
> >Laboratory of Theoretical Chemistry
> >Universidade Federal de São Carlos,  SP - Brazil
> >
> >
> >2011/3/16 <[email protected]>
> >
> >>   A quick look at the first file (admin.php) show me that :
> >> - You're using global, which is usually not a good idea.
> >> - You're calling the echo function many times, why not closing the
> barket
> >> and writing strait html instead ?
> >> - You're embedding things likeand in the code, which is bad for
> >> maintainability, and also are deprecated and should be managed by a CSS
> or
> >> template file instead.
> >>
> >> - Please comment your code ! How can we help if we don't know what the
> >> program is supposed to do ?
> >>
> >>  Global is fine as the core of the CMS turns off registering globals as
> >> that is a huge security whole and the only items globalized are config
> >> information, a link to the database, and a link to the users class.
> Again,
> >> my CMS was written with security first, functionality second. So far it
> has
> >> proven more secure than any other CMS I've tested. But, the version in
> >> current use has outgrown it's usefulness as a more advanced system.
> Hence a
> >> complete rewrite. Again focused on security first. The new rewrite will
> >> effectively remove globalized variables, only 3 of which exist anyways.
> >> I do call echo a lot and using straight HTML can make things simpler. I
> >> think it's more a programmers choice. I've seen it all from programs
> that
> >> just appended to a variable that is then finally output to the browser
> to
> >> straight HTML that then has PHP plugged into it. I think all ways are
> viable
> >> and accomplish the same task. Really up to the programmer(s) in my
> opinion.
> >> True, CSS should maintain these items, which it does, only very very
> >> limited items are used in the code to setup basic HTML elements that can
> be
> >> modified within the CSS. What you see is the initial rough draft that
> was
> >> not ment to be shown to the public. Hence no comments. I assure you my
> code
> >> is commented heavily.
> >>  I'm open to ideas on the output method to use when dumping PHP.
> >> Personally, I don't like to output straight HTML with PHP code plugged
> in.
> >> It prevents me from being able to make massive changes as my system only
> >> uses the most basic HTML elements to show some of the data. There are
> other
> >> modules with virtually no HTML code. Over my 6 years of PHP I've found
> that
> >> echoing straight out when needed is efficient enough. I have tried
> straight
> >> HTML with PHP plugged in, so I'm not just stating from no knowledge.
> I've
> >> also tried dumping output to a global variable that is then output by
> the
> >> final processor command. It can be useful to do it that way, but I've
> found
> >> it harder to debug sometimes.
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> ArchServer Project General Mail List
> >> Post messages to: [email protected]
> >> Administer your subscription:
> http://lists.archserver.org/listinfo/general
> >>
> >>
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >ArchServer Project General Mail List
> >Post messages to: [email protected]
> >Administer your subscription:
> http://lists.archserver.org/listinfo/general
> _______________________________________________
> ArchServer Project General Mail List
> Post messages to: [email protected]
> Administer your subscription: http://lists.archserver.org/listinfo/general
>
_______________________________________________
ArchServer Project General Mail List
Post messages to: [email protected]
Administer your subscription: http://lists.archserver.org/listinfo/general

Reply via email to